Cosmonauts/Astronauts: Solid Giemsa dicentrics assay
Scenario
      Cosmic rays are one of the main hazards for long-term manned space missions. Astronauts/cosmonauts are exposed to various types of high energy charged particles of the galactic or solar origin. They include electrons, positrons, protons or heavier ions of high energy. However, the cosmic ray flux around the space crafts are significantly different from those in free space since the primary cosmic rays are decelerated by and bombarding the structure of the space crafts, and hence producing a variety of secondary particles inside the space crafts. The radiation environment of the astronauts is thus considerably differs depending on space activity, e.g., missions inside the space craft or extra-vehicle activity. Heavy ion bombardment may produce one-third of the total neutron flux, and in the International Space Station (ISS; image by Wikipedia 2015), it has been estimated that approximately 30 % of the dose received by the astronauts comes from the albedo neutrons and secondary neutrons created by interactions in the shielding materials. The neutron energies should extend from thermal energies up to a few GeV. The total radiation environment is thus completely different from that we can experience, naturally or experimentally, on the earth. Moreover, the biological response is also complex, for instance, like photons, neutrons can activate DNA repair pathways (adaptive response) as well at low doses while high LET charged particles do not. The health consequences of hits by HZE particles not clear. The health effects associated with the manned space exploration in the mixed radiation field and their quantitative evaluation is the major concern in the current space radiobiology. Chromosome aberration analysis has been carried out in the cosmonauts/astronauts to meet this requirement. 
 

[1] ANTARES and ALTAIR missions: Analysis by solid Giemsa methods, Testard et al. 1996 


References
     Testard, I., Ricoult, M., Hoffschir, F., Flury-Herard, A., Dutrillaux, B., Fedorenko, B., Gerasimenko, V. and Sabatier, L. (1996): Radiation-induced chromosome damage in astronauts’ lymphocytes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 70:403-411.

Chromosome aberration analysis
     Blood samples were taken from Russian (R) and French (F) astronauts 1-2 months before and 1 and 7 days after space missions ANTARES (1992) and ALTÏR (1993). Chromosomes were analyzed by R-banding or Giemsa staining method. The increase in chromosome damage, as measured by chromosome breaks, was negligible for 2 week mission (F1) and slight for 3 week mission (F2). However, significant increase of chromosome damage was found for 6 month missions (R1-R5). Cells with multiple chromosome aberrations (rogue cells) were observed in post-flight samples of R3 (one in 1000 cells) and R5 (4 in 1100 cells). The cells with 8 or more breaks were considered as “rogue” cells. The authors assumed that they could be a consequence of a hit by HZE particle and included in the damage evaluation.

Astronaut* Duration of Blood sampling No. of cells No. of cells Chromosome aberrations Distribution of cells with indicated number of breaks***
flight scored aberration Dics cR xAce+min 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
F1 2 w after 657 1 0 1 0
F2 3 w after 1,000 5 2 1 2
R1 6 mo after 930 12 4 3 8 918 1 9 1 1
R2 6 mo before 1,000 (5) 3 0 2
after 1,305 16 8 2 6 1,289 4 12
R3 6 mo before 1,001 14 5 2 7
after 1,000 26 20 5 11 974 4 17 4 1
R4 6 mo after 982 7 3 1 3 975 3 4
R5 6 mo before 1,000 13 4 1 14
after 1,100 23 14 3 36 1,077 6 12 1 2 1 1
Controls** 60,000 3 1 (3) 2
*) F: French astronauts, R: Russian astronauts. Blood samples were taken 1-2 mo before ANTARES and ALTAIR space flights and 1 and 7 days after flights.
**) Controls are taken from Lloyd et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 61:335-343, 1992.
***) Cells with multiple aberrations (rogue cells) were found in the post-flight samples from R3 and R5. These aberrations were included. The cells exhibiting 8 or more breaks were considered as rouge cells.


Commentary (Editorial):
     As seen in the Table above, the cellular distribution of damage is given as cells with indicated number of breaks. The break distribution was converted to the approximate number of two-break aberrations by A≈int(B/2), in which A is number of two-break aberrations in a class (n-1) and B is number of breaks in a class (n). Then, the dose distribution profiles were obtained by unfolding aberration distribution of virtuailized dicentrics and rings.




[2] MIR and EUROMIR missions: Analysis by solid Giemsa method, Obe et al. 1997

Reference
     Obe, G., Johannes, I., Johannes, C., Hallman, K., Reitz, G. and Facius, R. (1997): Chromosomal aberrations in blood lymphocytes of astronauts after long-term space flights. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 72:727-734.


Chromosome aberration analysis (conventional Giemsa method)
      Blood samples were taken from the astronauts a few days before (BF-samples) and after return from the last space flight (AF-samples). Chromosome aberrations were analyzed by conventional Giemsa staining method. Chromosome-type aberrations were significantly elevated in blood samples taken after flight as compared to those before. Two cells with multiple aberrations (rogue cells) were observed in post-flight sample of astronaut A2.

Astronaut Missio of Duration (days) of low LET dose (mGy) High LET dose (mGy) Planar flux of HZE* (cm-2) Blood No. of Damaged Chromosome aberrations*** Distribution of dicentrics****
last flight earlier flight last flight total earlier flight last flight earlier flight last flight earlier flight last flight sampling** cells cells (%) Dic cR aR xAce ctd aberr 0 1 2
A1 BF - - - - - - - - - -
MIR94 7+166+146 180 499 93 68 65 4 100 140 AF 599 1.8 6 0 1 5 0 593 6
A2 BF 1,161 1.7 4 0 0 13 3 1,157 4
MIR95 237+179 120 536 164 57 11.7 4.1 375 160 AF 2,783 2.3 14 4 4 49 0 2,770 12 1
A3 BF 1,444 0.3 2 0 0 2 1 1,442 2
MIR95 0 120 120 - 57 - 4.1 - 160 AF 2,786 0.6 3 0 3 13 0 2,784 1 1
A4 BF 4,852 0.1 2 0 0 5 0 4,850 2
EUROMIR95 0 179 179 - 85 - 6.1 - 240 AF 214 0.9 1 1 0 0 0 213 1
A5 BF 210 3.3 1 0 0 6 0 209 1
EUROMIR95 0 179 179 - 85 - 6.1 - 240 AF 452 7.7 5 2 3 29 1 447 5
A6 BF 2,156 0.5 3 0 0 5 2 2,153 3
MIR96 0 198 198 - 94 - 6.7 - 270 AF 1,593 1.4 11 2 5 6 1 1,582 11
A7 BF 1,044 1.3 2 1 1 4 6 1,042 2
MIR96 0 198 198 - 94 - 6.7 - 270 AF 2,156 1.5 11 2 6 14 0 2,145 11
Pooled data from A2 to A7 BF 10,867 0.6 14 1 1 35 12 10,853 14
AF 9,984 1.7 45 11 21 111 2 9,935 47 2
*) HZE particles of LET&rt;2.0 GeV/cm. The high LET radiation dose includes the dose due to HZE.
**) BF: before flight, AF: after flight
***) Dic: dicentrics, cR: centric rings, aR: acentric rings, xAce: excess acentrics including double minutes, ctd: pooled total chromatid-type aberrations.
Two rogue cells (one cell with 6 dicentrics and another cell with 1 tricentric and 3 dicentrics) found in the after flight sample from astronaut A2 are excluded.
****) Dicentrics distribution data are courtesy of Dr. G. Obe (Department of Genetics, University of GH Essen, Germany).

Commentary (Editorial)
     The assessment of dose distribution profiles by unfolding dicentric distribution in samples taken either before (BF) or after (AF) flight for the astronaut A2 and astronauts A2-A7 combined. The distribution of dicentrics (also shown in Table above) is courtesy of Dr. G. Obe (University of GH Essen, Germany). The ‘rogue’ cells are not considered in this dose assessment. EWBD=equivalent whole body dose. Fx=exposed fraction. Dx=dose to the exposed fraction.




[3] MIR missions: Analysis by solid Giemsa method, Fedoreko et al. 2001

Reference
     Fedorenko, B., Druzhinin, S., Yudaeva, L., Petrov, V., Akatov, Yu., Snigiryova, G., Novitskaya, N., Shevchenko, V. and Rubanovich, A. (2001): Cytogenetic studies of blood lymphocytes from cosmonauts after long-term space flight on MIR station. Adv. Space Res., 27:355-359.

Chromosome aberration analysis
     Chromosome aberration analyses were carried out on a total of 22 cosmonauts 1-2 months before and a day after long-term space flight on MIR station. Some of the cosmonauts were examined after repeated flights. The duration of the mission was on average 4-6 months. Chromosome preparations were stained by Giemsa and chromosome-type aberrations were scored.
     In most of the cosmonauts, the chromosome aberration frequencies were significantly higher in the post-flight samples as compared to those in pre-flight samples, on average approximately 3 times elevation.

Cosmonaut, code* 01(1) 01(2) 01(3) 02(1) 02(2) 03 04 05 06 07 08 09(1) 09(2) 010 011 012 013 014(1) 014(2) 015 016 017 018(1) 018(2) 019 020(1) 020(2) 021 022
No. of cells BF*** 200 850 1500 200 1310 500 550 500 1500 2400 1415 200 500 500 1200 150 1001 200 1000 500 1500 140 700 1000 500 200 1160 874 1500
AF 930 536 500 100 612 350 500 500 1000 1000 1387 200 1000 1000 1000 900 760 352 500 1000 500 700 1020 1000 758 220 1000 1000 593
Aberration**, % BF 2.00 1.06 1.93 1.50 1.53 1.60 0.73 1.40 2.67 1.08 1.41 2.50 2.40 0.40 2.00 1.33 1.40 1.00 2.10 2.00 1.80 1.43 3.14 2.30 1.80 2.50 1.38 1.37 1.13
AF 1.61 2.99 4.00 3.00 1.14 1.71 1.60 4.00 2.20 1.30 1.66 7.00 2.20 3.00 1.70 1.44 3.42 1.42 3.60 2.40 2.20 2.71 1.08 1.90 1.85 4.09 1.40 1.00 1.52
Cells with Dic+cR, % BF 0.00 0.35 0.27 0.00 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20
AF 0.75 0.00 0.40 1.00 0.49 0.29 0.20 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.65 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.33 0.26 0.57 1.00 0.20 0.60 0.14 0.69 0.40 0.13 0.45 0.20 0.10 0.67
Dic+cR, % BF 0.00 0.35 0.27 0.00 0.31 0.40 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20
AF 0.75 0.00 0.40 1.00 0.49 0.29 0.20 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.65 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.33 0.26 0.57 1.20 0.20 0.60 0.14 0.69 0.40 0.13 0.45 0.20 0.10 0.67
*) The number in parentheses indicates the number of space flights the cosmonauts engaged in.
**) Chromosome-type aberrations including dicentrics (Dic) and centric rings (cR).
***) Blood sampling before (BF) or after (AF) the flight.




[4] MIR and ISS missions: Analysis by solid Giemsa method, Durante et al. 2003 

Reference
     Durante, M., Snigiryva, G., Akaeva, E., Bogomazova, A., Druzhinin, S., Fedorenko, B., Greco, O., Novitskaya, N., Rubanovich, A., Shevchenko, V., von Recklinghausen, U. and Obe, G. (2003): Chromosomal aberration dosimetry in cosmonauts after single or multiple space flight. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 103:40-46.

Chromosome aberration analysis
     Chromosome analyses were carried out in blood samples from 33 crew members of long-term missions on MIR or the International Space Station (ISS), and on short-term taxi flights, spanning about ten years (from 1992 to 2003). Chromosome aberrations were analyzed either by Giemsa staing or by FISH painting.

Flight activities and cumulative doses of cosmonauts Chromosome analysis before and after the first flight (Giemsa) Translocation (TR) assay before and after a flight (FISH)***
Cosmonaut No. of Total time Total EVA Cumulative Flight Dose Before flight After flight Flight at Before flight After flight
code space flight in space (days) time* (h) dose** (mGy) duration (days) (mGy) Cells Dics Cells Dics sampling Days in space Cells TR=(FG±SE)×10-3 Days in space Cells TR=(FG±SE)×10-3
3 3 415 20 156 146 51 200 0 200 1 3 342 204 0 415 1,902 5.3±2.9
4 5 651 79 257
5 3 748 42 289 189 81 200 0 930 7 3 368 941 13.4±6.6 748 1,243 10.1±5.0
8 4 373 32 126
9 4 556 39 187 3 357 387 16.0±12.0 546 1,277 5.2±3.4
10 4 553 31 235+STS101 182 94 300 0 900 6 4 386 1,452 13.0±5.0 553 1,265 9.9±4.9
11 2 382 19 201 197 99 200 0 220 1
12 3 341 43 150 126 67 200 0 352 2
13 2 138 17 67+STS106 126 67 150 0 400 3
18 2 244 37 96 115 69 1,415 3 1,387 9 2 115 1,590 6.2±3.5 244 4,005 7.5±2.4
19 1 198 25 90 198 90 1,000 2 1,000 6
20 3 330 4 137 179 113 2,100 2 1,000 6 2 179 1,293 7.7±4.1 320 1,876 6.0±3.0
21 2 390 43 143 194 118 500 0 1,000 2 2 194 520 18.0±11.0 390 1,607 24.0±7.0
22 1 185 0 102 185 102 700 2 1,000 2
23 2 382 22 129 197 97 500 0 1,000 1
24 2 283 31 132
25 1 199 6 48 199 48 1,000 3 990 4
27 1 185 5 32 185 32 1,000 1 1,000 0 1 0 1,848 9.0±4.0 185 2,059 7.8±3.5
28 1 21 0 8 21 7.7 1,000 0 1,000 1
29 2 210 6 57
30 2 20 0 7 12 6 1,000 2 477 1
31 1 9 0 SRS89
32 2 26 0 16
33 1 8 0 6 8 6 1,000 1 1,000 4
36 2 84 5 9 73 7.5 1,000 2 1,000 0 1 0 3,173 5.2±2.3 73 895 3.7±3.7
38 5 624 36 154+STS60,88 5 483 462 0 624 1,654 2.2±2.2
39 1 129 14 27 129 27 1,000 0 1,000 2 1 0 1,489 10.6±4.7 129 2,355 6.8±3.1
40 1 8 0 2.2
41 1 10 0 2 10 2 1,000 0 1,000 1
43 1 10 0 1.8 10 1.8 1,000 0 1,000 1 1 0 3,397 8.7±3.1 10 1,908 5.8±3.3
44 1 10 0 1.8 10 1.8 1,000 1 1,000 2 1 0 1,886 10.0±4.0 11 1,371 12.0±5.0
46 1 11 0 1.8 11 1.4 1,000 0 1,000 2
47 2 23 0 1.4+STS100
*) EVA: extra-vehcular activity.
**) Dose from Space Shuttle missions STS60, STS88, STS89, STS100, STS101and STS106 are missing.
***) Whole chromosome painting probes are either 1,2; 1,3,5; or 1,4,12 combination cocktail. The translocations were converted to the whole genome equivalent, FG using the formula of Lucas et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 62:53-63, 1992.

Commentary (Editorial)
     Physical dose grossly increases in proportion to the flight duration (A). Dicentric aberrations (net-induced Dics) increases with the increase of flight duration (B) and dose accumulation (C), but reaches a maximum and then tends to decrease with further accumulation of flight duration and dose. However, in contrast, the response of translocations (FG) is refractory to the total duration of flight (D). Graphs A to C are those smoothed by moving window averaging, MWA=(w5,s1). The use of translocation assay by FISH in biological dosimetry should be treated with caution. 



[5] Astronauts: Analysis by solid Giemsa and FISH painting methods, Hayata et al. 2008 

Reference
     Hayata, I., Koike, Y., Minamihisamatsu, M., Yabe, S., Shurshackov, V. A., Snigiryova, G. P. and Bogomazova, A. (2008): Chromosome aberrations in astronauts. In; Taniguchi, K. and Zhang, X. eds., “Advances in Chromosome Sciences”, Vol. 3., pp.110-111.

Chromosome aberration analysis
     Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 5 Russian astronauts at the Institute of BioMedical Problems (INMP), Russia. The blood was cultured at the Institute of Roentgenology and Radiology (IRR), Russia, and the fixed samples were brought to the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Japan. Chromosomes were studied by both conventional Giemsa staining method and FISH painting method.
     The authors concluded that the frequencies of dicentrics and rings as studied by solid Giemsa method significantly increaed in the post-flight samples, but the changes in translocation frequencies as revealed by FISH painting were not conclusive.

Expedition ID* Duration of Physical dose Solid Giemsa staining FISH painting**
mission (days) (mSv) No. of cells Dics+cR+Fr Freq/1000 No. of cells Complex Tr (FG/1000) Dic (FG/1000)
Expedition 14 144b 2,141 3 1.40 3,100 2 16 (14.3) 1 (0.9)
155a 198 104 1,745 7 4.01 3,050 1 8 (7.3) 4 (3.6)
Expedition 14 146b 2,331 1 0.43 3,050 0 9 (8.2) 1 (0.9)
156a 198 104 991 2 2.02 2,443 1 12 (13.7) 1 (1.1)
Expedition 15 152b 2,076 7 3.37 3,050 0 11 (10.0) 2 (1.8)
164a 192 111 1,694 8 4.72
- 159b 2,002 3 1.50 3,021 0 3 (2.8) 3 (2.8)
- 161b 2,003 8 3.99 3,409 3 13 (10.6) 2 (1.6)
*) (b): sampling before mission. (a): sampling after mission.
**)HISH with whole chromosome painting probes for chromosome 1, 2 and 4.