Chernobyl NPP Accident: Residents or Evacuees-(1) |
[1] Residents in Belarus; Children |
Scenario |
Chromosomes in blood lymphocytes were studied
in 41 children who came to Italy in three groups (A, B and C) for 1 month
stay during 1991-1992 for 137Cs whole body counting (WBC) and urine radiotoxicological
analysis. |
Reference |
Padonani, L., Caporossi, D., Tedeschi, B., Vernole, P., Nicoletti, B. and Mauro, F. (1991): Cytogenetic study in lymphocytes from children exposed to ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident. Mutation Res., 319:55-60. |
Chromosome aberration analysis |
. | ||||||||||||
Group | No. of | Sex | 137Cs ground | 137Cs WBC | No. of | Aberrations/1,000 cells | ||||||
subject | activity (Bq/km2) | (Bq) | cells | AF | Dic | Tr | csb | ctb | ||||
A | 9 | 5F, 4M | 55-150×1010 | 460-2,795 | 5,000 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 10.8 | 12.8 | ||
B | 24 | 8F, 16M | 4-40×1010 | 44-397 | 20,020 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 9.6 | ||
C | 8 | 3F, 5M | 4-55×1010 | 7,714-32,343 | 3,650 | 3 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 17 | ||
. |
[2] Residents in Belarus and Kiev. |
Scenario |
Blood sampling was mostly 4 yrs after the Chernobyl accident. Blood samples were obtained from 16 people (15 in Belarus, one in Kiev) living during and after the Chernobyl accidents, in which 12 were in Minsk district (about 350 km), 2 were in Gomel district (about 150 km), one was in Mogilev district (300 km), and one in Kiev (about 100 km from Chernobyl). |
Reference |
Scheid, W., Weber, J., Petrenko, S. and Traut, H. (1993): Chromosome aberrations in human kymphocytes apparently induced by Chernobyl fallout. Health Phys., 64:531-534. |
Chromosome aberration analysis |
. | . | |||||||||||||||||||
Subject | Location | Sex | Age | Sampling | No. of | Chromosome aberrations | Subject | Location | Sex | Age | Sampling | No. of | Chromosome aberrations | |||||||
ID | date | cells | Dic | cR | aR | ID | date | cells | Dic | cR | aR | |||||||||
44a) | Kiev | M | 53 | 1987 | 836 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 67 | Minsk | F | 16 | 1990 | 1,227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
47a) | Kiev | M | 54 | 1988 | 1,951 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 71 | Minsk | F | 15 | 1990 | 1,248 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
63 | Gomel | F | 16 | 1990 | 1,232 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 72 | Minsk | F | 13 | 1990 | 1,282 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
81 | Gomel | M | 22 | 1991 | 1,162 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74 | Minsk | F | 14 | 1990 | 1,080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
80 | Mogilev | M | 14 | 1991 | 1,271 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | Minsk | F | 13 | 1990 | 1,212 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
70 | Minsk | M | 38 | 1990 | 1,140 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 77b) | Minsk | F | 16 | 1990 | 2,872 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |||
73 | Minsk | M | 12 | 1990 | 1,250 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 88b) | Minsk | F | 17 | 1991 | 1,201 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |||
78 | Minsk | M | 13 | 1990 | 1,182 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69 | Minsk | M | 51 | 1990 | 1,325 | 4 | 0 | 1 | |||
66 | Minsk | F | 16 | 1990 | 874 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | Minsk | F | 13 | 1990 | 601 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |||
a) Subject ID 44 and 47 are the same person. b) Subject ID 77 and 78 are the same parson. | ||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[3] Residents in Gomel and Vetka, Belarus |
Scenario |
Blood samples were obtained at the
general and regional Hospital in Gomel and Vetka, respectively, in December
1990 (almost 5 years after the Chernobyl accident). The subjects were general
populations and no physical dose estimation was done to individual subjects.
In the Gomel area, surface contaminations of 137Cs typically ranges from 37 kBq/m2 to more than 1480 kBq/m2, and there are also minor areas contaminated by 90Sr with surface activities from 37 to 111 kBq/m2. The estimate of dose received by the inhabitants are very approximate and sometimes very variable. Individual doses over the 1986-1990 period are for example estimated at 35-60 mSv, whereas in children, doses absorbed by the thyroid gland may vary between 2 and 5 Sv. |
Reference |
Verschaeve, L., Domracheva, E. V., Kuznetsov, S. A. and Nechai, V. V. (1993): Chromosome aberrations in inhabitants of Byelorussia: consequence of the Chernobyl accident. Mutation Res., 287:253-259. |
Chromosome aberration analysis |
. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Sex | Age | Residence | No. of | Aberrations/100 cells | ID | Sex | Age | Residence | No. of | Aberrations/100 cells | ID | Sex | Age | Residence | No. of | Aberrations/100 cells | ||||||||||||||||
(yrs) | cells | Dics | cR | AF | cdb | cte | (yrs) | cells | Dics | cR | AF | cdb | cte | (yrs) | cells | Dics | cR | AF | cdb | cte | |||||||||||||
1 | F | 28 | Veika | 200 | 2.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 4 | 0 | 16 | F | 45 | Veika | 132 | 0.8 | 0 | 6.1 | 0 | 0.8 | 34 | F | 32 | Gomel | 200 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 2 | 0 | ||||
2 | F | 40 | Veika | 170 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 | 17 | M | 41 | Veika | 110 | 0 | 0 | 4.5(2) | 0.9 | 0 | 36 | M | 27 | Gomel | 236 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.4 | 5 | 0 | ||||
3 | M | 35 | Veika | 114 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | 18 | F | 20 | Veika | 177 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 0 | 39 | F | 42 | Gomel | 119 | 0.8 | 0 | 3.4(3) | 0.8 | 0 | ||||
4 | F | 43 | Veika | 133 | 2.3(1) | 0 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 19 | F | 37 | Veika | 300 | 2.7 | 0 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 42 | F | 55 | Gomel | 67 | 1.6 | 0 | 3 | 1.6 | 0 | ||||
5 | F | 29 | Veika | 100 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 20 | F | 28 | Gomel | 447 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 43 | F | 30 | Gomel | 50 | 6 | 0 | 18(4) | 6 | 0 | ||||
6 | F | 43 | Veika | 200 | 1.5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 21 | F | 57 | Gomel | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 0 | 44 | F | 16 | Gomel | 208 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 0 | ||||
7 | F | 31 | Veika | 200 | 1.5 | 0 | 2 | 1.5 | 0 | 22 | F | 50 | Veika | 50 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 46 | F | 28 | Gomel | 86 | 2.4 | 0 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 0 | ||||
8 | F | 30 | Veika | 145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | F | 44 | Veika | 86 | 8.4 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||
9 | F | 40 | Veika | 202 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 24 | M | 34 | Veika | 50 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
10 | F | 27 | Veika | 115 | 0.9 | 0 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 0 | 25 | M | 31 | Veika | 300 | 0.7 | 0 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
11 | F | 46 | Novoselki | 89 | 0 | 0 | 5.6 | 0 | 2.3 | 26 | F | 24 | Veika | 200 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
12 | M | 53 | Solotoj | 109 | 0 | 0 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 27 | F | 29 | Veika | 230 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 2.2 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
14 | F | 50 | Veika | 82 | 1.2 | 0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 31 | M | 28 | Gomel | 200 | 3 | 0 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 0 | Controls | Mol | 10,000 | <0.1 | 0 | 0.3 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
15 | F | 45 | Veika | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 33 | M | 44 | Gomel | 50 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | Moscow | 4,800 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | <0.1 | |||||||
(1) including one tricentric chromosome | (2) including one acentric ring | (3) including two acentric rings | . | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4) including one cell with five and one with double minutes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[4] Bryansk (Russia): Residents |
Scenario |
Chromosome analysis in blood lymphocytes was carried out as a part of the clinical investigation of people during the pilot study of comparative epidemiological project, ESMER (Ecological, Social and Medical Research on the long-term consequences of the Chernobyl nuclear power station accident). Blood samples were taken during January-April 1993 from residents of Krasnyi Rog (control group) and Mirnyi (exposed group). |
Reference |
Salomaa, S., Sevan’kaev, A. V., Zhloba, A. A., Kumpusalo, E., Mäkinen, S., Lindholm, C., Kumpusalo, L., Kolmakow, S. an Nissinen, A. (1997): Unstable and stable chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of people exposed to Chernobyl fallout in Bryansk, Russia. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 71:51-59. |
Chromosome aberration analysis |
. | |||||||||||||
Cohort | 137Cs | No. of | Age (yrs) | Wemen | No. of | Aberrant cells | Chromosome aberrations | ||||||
(surface level) | persons | (mean±SE) | (%) | cells | Cu | Cs | Dics | cR | aM | F | |||
Krasnyi Rog | <37 kBq/m2 | 100 | 27.2±0.5 | 58 | 37,541 | 57 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 39 | ||
Mirnyi | >1,100 kBq/m2 | 100 | 26.8±0.5 | 56 | 40,701 | 97 | 5 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 66 | ||
. |
[5] Belarus and Russia: Residents |
Scenario |
In the first series of study,
blood samples were obtained from children who lived in the contaminated
areas in Belarus and Russia. One sub-group of Belarussian children include
those who were evacuated during the first week after accident from the
highly contaminated areas of Bragin, Narovlya and Khoinik districts to
more lightly contaminated Gomel city or to Zhlobin region. In the second series of study, samples were also obtained
from adults in the contaminated regions (Gorbeevka and Zlynka regions)
in Russia. |
Reference |
Sevan’kaev, A. V., Lloyd, D. C., Potetnia O. I., Zhloba, A. A., Moiseenko, V. V. and Edwards, A. A. (1995): Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of residents of areas contaminated by adioactive discharges from the Chernobyl accident. Radiat. Protect. Dosimet., 58:247-254. |
Chromosome aberration analysis |
. | |||||||||||||||
Place | Average (and range) of surface contamination | No. of | Average age (y) | No. of | No. of | No. of aberrations | |||||||||
137Cs (kBq/m2) | 90Sr (kBq/m2) | Dose (mSv) | Male | Female | at sampling | cells | Cu cells | Dicentrics | Centric rings | Excess acentrics | |||||
Belarus | Gomel region | Lelchitsy district | 75 (30-180) | 7 (1.5-15) | 8 | 17 | 24 | 14 (9-17) | 7,918 | 49 | 6 | 3 | 40 | ||
Bragin district | 100 (35-220) | 15 (3.5-35) | 12 | 17 | 17 | 14 (5-17) | 6,409 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 29 | ||||
Vetkov district | 200 (60-350) | 15 (0.5-35) | 22 | 14 | 15 | 14 (11-17) | 5,617 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 18 | ||||
Zhlobin district | 75 (20-150) | 5 (3-10) | 11 | 139* | 193* | 12 (5-17) | 64,948 | 304 | 48 | 20 | 249 | ||||
Gomel city | 75 (25-90) | 13 (1-30) | 12 | ||||||||||||
Oktyabr district (Controls) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 15 | 10 (2-16) | 16,398 | 45 | 5 | 2 | 40 | ||||
Russia | Kaluga region | Zhidra district | 100 (50-150) | no data | 10 | 159 | 175 | 11 (2-17) | 65,886 | 236 | 21 | 9 | 212 | ||
Ulianovo district | 140 (75-190) | no data | 14 | 89 | 67 | 8 (1-17) | 30,153 | 131 | 21 | 9 | 104 | ||||
Bryansk region | Klintsy district | 100 (75-200) | 4 (no data) | 11 | 93 | 77 | no data | 47,567 | 168 | 23 | 13 | 137 | |||
Gordeevka district (children) | 700 (400-1000) | no data | 70 | 202 | 232 | 12 (2-17) | 98,178 | 271 | 49 | 6 | 225 | ||||
(adults) | 13 | 43 | 34 (18-65) | 15,534 | 51 | 9 | 2 | 44 | |||||||
Zlynka district (children) | 1000 (500-1300) | 20 (7-25) | 102 | 23 | 38 | 10 (2-16) | 12,200 | 53 | 17 | 5 | 33 | ||||
(adults) | 70 | 27 | 54 (20-78) | 18,782 | 128 | 35 | 4 | 96 | |||||||
Pochep district (adult controls) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 24 | 35 (19-58) | 13,885 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 23 | ||||
*) Including Belarussian children evacuated with their famiies from the highly contaminated area of Bragin, Narovlya and Khoinik districts with up to 1,500 kBq/m2 of 137Cs and 150 kBq/m2 of 90Sr. | |||||||||||||||
Theevacuated during the first week after the accident to Gomel city or Zhlobin district where contamination levels were considerably lower and essentially similar. | |||||||||||||||
. |
[6] Belarus and Ukraine: Residents |
Scenario |
Blood samples were taken from the residents of Belarus and Ukraine 13-15 years after the accident. The lymphocytes were tested for chromosome translocations, micronuclei, HPRT mutations and apoptosis. |
Reference |
Edwards, A., Voisin, P., Sorokine-Durm, I., Maznik, N., Vinnikov, V., Mikhalevich, L., Moquet, J., Lloyd, D., Delbos, M. and Durand, V. (2004): Biological estimates of dose to inhabitants of Belarus and Ukraine following the Chernobyl accident. Radiat. Protect. Dosimet., 111:211-219. |
Chromosome aberration analysis |
. | FISH scoring of samples from Belarus. | ||||||||||||
Code | Sex | Age at time of | Residence at time | 137Cs level | Genome eq. | Translocations | Dics | Excess | |||||
accident | analysis | of catastrophe | (kBq/m2) | cells | two-way | one-way | acentrics | ||||||
Exposed | M15 | F | 8 | 22 | v. Bogush 30-km zone | 850 | 1,021 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||
M20 | F | 7 | 22 | v. Gluchovichi | 510 | 938 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
M23 | F | 7 | 22 | v. Ryzkov | 370 | 1,064 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |||
M17 | F | 7 | 22 | v. Kovaka | 300 | 1,108 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | |||
M22 | M | 7 | 22 | v. Shkurata | 260 | 1,076 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | |||
M19 | F | 6 | 21 | v. Novyi Put | 200 | 1,107 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 12 | |||
M2 | M | 2 | 15 | Khoinikio | 140 | 969 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | |||
M3 | M | 2 | 15 | Khoinikio | 140 | 1,052 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | |||
M4 | M | 2 | 15 | Khoinikio | 140 | 1,106 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |||
M18 | F | 11 | 26 | v. Prosmochi | 130 | 1,078 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
M16 | F | 10 | 25 | v. Lubeniki | 110 | 1,103 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |||
M21 | F | 7 | 22 | v. Dubeniki | nd | 1,097 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 6 | |||
M9 | F | 7 | 21 | Gomel | 80 | 1,117 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | |||
M12 | F | 6 | 20 | Kalinkovichi | 40 | 875 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
M5 | M | 7 | 20 | Love | 20 | 857 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5 | |||
Controls | M6 | F | 9 | 22 | Minsk | 1 | 888 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | ||
M8 | F | 6 | 20 | Minsk | 1 | 1,076 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |||
M10 | F | 7 | 21 | Minsk | 1 | 1,077 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |||
M11 | M | 7 | 21 | Minsk | 1 | 1,231 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 7 | |||
M13 | M | 6 | 20 | Minsk | 1 | 1,125 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |||
M14 | F | 6 | 20 | Minsk | 1 | 1,151 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
. |