[AC1] Over-exposure to Co-60 gamma-rays |
. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exposure: August 2, 1967. Tokyo | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject: Medical doctor | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario: Over-exposure to 60Co gamma-rays due to the shutter trouble of tele-cobalt therapeutic macine. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling: September 26, 1967. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Age | Sex | Physical estimate (mSv) | No. of | Aberrations | Distribution of Dics+Rings | ||||||||||||||||
(yrs) | Before | After | cells | Tri | Dic | Rc | Ra | aM | F | del | S | del | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
29 | M | 0 | 16.9 | 1,275 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1,274 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Chromosomally estimated dose (cGy): 0 (0-2.98). | . | |||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[AC2] Over-exposure to Co-60 gamma-rays |
. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exposure: June, 1967. Tokyo | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject: RI worker | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario: Over-exposure to 60Co gamma-rays during unloading the cobalt source from an irradiator (Film badge reading was approximately 40 mSv) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling: September 26, 1967. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Age | Sex | Physical estimate (mSv) | No. of | Aberrations | Distribution of Dics+Rings | ||||||||||||||||
(yrs) | Before | After | cells | Tri | Dic | Rc | Ra | aM | F | del | S | del | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
25 | M | 0 | 40 | 838 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 838 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Chromosomally estimated dose (cGy): 0 (0-4.32) | . | |||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[AC3] Beta-ray accident |
. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exposure: March 30, 1968, Yokohama | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject: Radiographer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario: While setting the film for radiography using Betatron (peak voltage=15MVp, dose rate=1.35 Gy/min), the Betatron was switched on, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
and exposed for 40-50 seconds. The calculated doses are a minimum 1.25 Gy to left hand and whole body dose was about 0.45 Gy. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling: April 17, 1968. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Age | Sex | Physical estimate (mSv) | No. of | Aberrations | Distribution of Dics+Rings | ||||||||||||||||
(yrs) | Before | After | cells | Tri | Dic | Rc | Ra | aM | F | del | S | del | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
25 | M | 450 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Chromosomally estimated dose (cGy-equivalent): 0 (0-3.70) | . | |||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[AC4] Over-exposures to gamma-ray |
. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exposure: July 15, 1971, Ibaraki | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject: Nuclear power plant workers (Charge machine operators) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario:During automatic housing of control rad from a charge machine, 3 operators were exposed to gamma-rays. Because the area monitor showed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
the background radiation, the operators entered the room, where they found that the control rod was not completely housed into the housing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
hole and they enforced in. The working time was 2-5 mins. Their personal dosimeters (maximum reading capacity of 200 mR) were over-scaled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Radioactivity of the rod was 200 R/hr at 1 m. The exposure doses were estimated to be 9.42, 7.80 and 2.98 rem, respectivel, according to the | ||||||||||||||||||||||
reconstruction of exposure scenario. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling: August 10, 1971. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Age | Sex | Physical estimate (mSv) | No. of | Aberrations | Distribution of Dics+Rings | ||||||||||||||||
(yrs) | Before | After | cells | Tri | Dic | Rc | Ra | aM | F | del | S | del | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
"A" | 31 | M | 11.0 | 78.0 | 2,000 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 28 | 16 | 11 | 10 | 1,989 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
"B" | 22 | M | 11.3 | 74.2 | 2,000 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1,997 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | . | |
"C" | 20 | M | 31.9 | 29.8 | 3,000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2,999 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Chromosomally estimated dose (cGy): | "A": | 15.62 (9.03-23.90) | ||||||||||||||||||||
"B": | 4.40 (0.47-10.43) | |||||||||||||||||||||
"C": | 0 (0-0.42) | |||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[AC5] X-ray accident |
. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exposure: September 19, 1975, Tokyo | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject: Radiographer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Scenario: Accidentally exposed to X-rays (50 kVp) during operation of X-ray fluoroscopy. Estimated doses were 20-30 Gy to the palms and | ||||||||||||||||||||||
0.5-1 Gy to the body. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sampling: September 30, 1975. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ID | Age | Sex | Physical estimate (mSv) | No. of | Aberrations | Distribution of Dics+Rings | ||||||||||||||||
(yrs) | Before | After | cells | Tri | Dic | Rc | Ra | aM | F | del | S | del | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
32 | M | 0 | 500-1000 | 2,000 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1,997 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Chromosomally estimated dose (cGy-equivalent): 2.63 (0-7.94) | . | |||||||||||||||||||||
. |
[AC6] High dose accidental exposure |
. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject: U. S. military man known to have been acidentally exposed to high level of radiation in 1956 and developed acute myerocytic leukemia | ||||||||||||||||||||
Blood sampling: 1965 (50-h lymphocyte culture), and direct preparation of bone marrow cells. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reference: Norman, A., Sasaki, M. S., Ottoman, R. E., Veomett, R. C. (1967): Use of chromosome aberrations to estimate X-ray and gamma-ray dose to man. Report of the USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, SAM-TR-67-112, pp.1-18. | ||||||||||||||||||||
No. of cells | Aberrant cells | Chromosome aberrations | No. of cells with: | Distribution of cells with indicated number of dicentrics | ||||||||||||||||
analyzed | Cu-cells | Cs-cells* | Dic | cR | aR | M | Ace | Ace | Dic+Ace | M+Ace | cR+Ace | Dic+M+Ace | M | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
370 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 368 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
*) The frequency of Cs-cells suggests the exposure to an equivalent whole body dose of 2-3 Gy. | ||||||||||||||||||||
. |